Navigating Vulnerability in the Context of Resettlement: Syrian Youth in Türkiye

Pelin Kılınçarslan; Müge Dalkıran; Ahmet İçduygu

doi:10.25071/1920-7336.41721

Auteurs-es

Pelin Kılınçarslan Koç University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2534-8444
Müge Dalkıran Koç University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7249-288X
Ahmet İçduygu Koç University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-5888

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.41721

Mots-clés :

resettlement, vulnerability, youth, Türkiye, Syrian refugees

Résumé

Cet article explore la vulnerabilité dans le cadre des expériences et des imaginaires de la réinstallation des jeunes réfugié.e.s syrien.ne.s (âgés de 18 à 35 ans) en Turquie, un groupe souvent exclu des cadres conventionnels de vulnérabilité. Sur la base d’entretiens approfondis, il conceptualise la vulnérabilité comme étant multiforme, avec des dimensions innées, structurelles et situationnelles. Les résultats illustrent la manière dont l’évolution des politiques migratoires, la politisation et les obstacles institutionnels aggravent l’insécurité, façonnant la manière dont les jeunes envisagent et poursuivent leur réinstallation dans des situations de réfugiés prolongées. L’étude contribue aux débats concernant la vulnérabilité, la migration des jeunes ainsi que les possibilités de réinstalations en évolitution et souligne le besoin de politiques et d’accords internationales qui adoptent une approche contextuelle qui tient compte des facteurs structurels et situationnels.

Statistiques

Chargement des statistiques…

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Pelin Kılınçarslan, Koç University

Pelin Kılınçarslan is a post-doctoral researcher at the Migration Research Center at Koç University (MiReKoc). She can be reached at pekilincarslan@ku.edu.tr.

Müge Dalkıran, Koç University

Müge Dalkıran is a post-doctoral researcher at the Migration Research Center at Koç University (MiReKoc). She can be reached at mdalkiran@ku.edu.tr.

Ahmet İçduygu, Koç University

Ahmet İçduygu is a full professor and the director of the Migration Research Center at Koç University (MiReKoc). He can be reached at aicduygu@ku.edu.tr.

Références

Alakoc, B. P., Goksel, G. U., & Zarychta, A. (2022). Political discourse and public attitudes toward Syrian refugees in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 54(3), 547–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5129/001041522X16263065025324

Anadolu Ajansı. (2024, December 24). İçişleri Bakanı Yerlikaya: Son 15 günde Suriye’ye dönenlerin sayısı 25 bini geçti [Interior Minister Yerlikaya: The number of people returning to Syria in the last 15 days has exceeded 25,000]. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/icisleri-bakani-yerlikaya-son-15-gunde-suriyeye-donenlerin-sayisi-25-bini-gecti/3432689

Armbruster, H. (2019). “It was the photograph of the little boy”: Reflections on the Syrian Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Programme in the UK. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(15), 2680–2699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2018.1554226

Baban, F., Ilcan, S., & Rygiel, K. (2017). Syrian refugees in Turkey: Pathways to precarity, differential inclusion, and negotiated citizenship rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(1), 41–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1192996

Baban, F., Ilcan, S., & Rygiel, K. (2021). The precarious lives of Syrians: Migration, citizenship, and temporary protection in Turkey. McGill-Queen’s University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780228009184

Bourcier, N. (2024, July 20). Syrian refugees attacked in Turkey: “The crisis makes us perfect scapegoats”. Le Monde. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/07/20/syrian-refugees-attacked-in-turkey-the-crisis-makes-usperfect-scapegoats_6691629_4.html

Bradby, H., Liabo, K., Ingold, A., & Roberts, H. (2017). Visibility, resilience, vulnerability in young migrants. Health, 23(5), 533–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459317739441

Brown, K. (2017). The governance of vulnerability: Regulation, support and social divisions in action. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 37(11/12), 667–682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2016-0049

Brown, K., Ecclestone, K., & Emmel, N. (2017). The many faces of vulnerability. Social Policy and Society, 16(3), 497–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746416000610

Bryant, R., Abdulla, A., Nimer, M., & Üstübici, A. (2024). Lives in limbo: Syrian youth in Turkey. Berghahn Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781805395140

Butler, J., Gambetti, Z., & Sabsay, L. (2016). Vulnerability in resistance. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11vc78r

Buxton, R. (2023). Justice in waiting: The harms and wrongs of temporary refugee protection. European Journal of Political Theory, 22(1), 51–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120973578

Crisp, J. (2004). Local integration and local settlement of refugees: A conceptual and historical analysis (Working paper no. 102). UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/407d3b762.pdf

de Boer, T., & Zieck, M. (2020). The legal abyss of discretion in the resettlement of refugees: Cherry-picking and the lack of due process in the EU (Amsterdam Law School legal studies research paper no. 2020-48).

Dereli, B. (2021). Belonging through higher education: The case of Syrian youth in Turkey. Journal of Refugee Studies, 35(1), 195–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feab055

Düvell, F., Schiefer, D., Sağıroğlu, A. Z., & Mann, L. (2021). How many Syrian refugees in Turkey want to migrate to Europe and can actually do so? Results of a survey among 1,900 Syrians. DeZIM Institut. https://www.deziminstitut.de/fileadmin/user_upload/fis/publikation_pdf/FA-5266.pdf

Erdoğan, M. (2022). Syrians barometer 2021: A framework for achieving social cohesion with Syrians in Türkiye. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2022/12/SB-2021-English-01122022.pdf

Erdoğan, A., & Erdoğan, M. M. (2018). Access, qualifications and social dimension of Syrian refugee students in Turkish higher education. In A. Curaj, L. Deca, & R. Pricopie (Eds.), European higher education area: The impact of past and future policies (pp. 259–276). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_17

Ertong Attar, G., & Küçükşen, D. (2019). Somehow familiar but still a stranger: Syrian students in Turkish higher education. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 20, 1041–1053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-00647-8

European Parliament. (2016). EU–Turkey statement & action plan. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-towards-a-new-policy-on-migration/file-eu-turkey-statement-action-plan

Fineman, M. A. (2010). The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal, 60(2), 251–275. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol60/iss2/1

Flegar, V. (2018). Who is deemed vulnerable in the governance of migration? Unpacking UNHCR’s and IOM’s policy label for being deserving of protection and assistance. Asiel & Migrantenrecht, 8, 374–383. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3375321

Gilodi, A., Albert, I., & Nienaber, B. (2024). Vulnerability in the context of migration: A critical overview and a new conceptual model. Hu Arenas, 7, 620–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00288-5

Gilodi, A., Richard, C., Albert, I., & Nienaber, B. (2023). The vulnerability of young refugees living in reception centres in Luxembourg: An overview of conditions and experiences across subjective temporal imaginaries. Social Sciences, 12(2), Article 102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12020102

Göç Araştırmaları Derneği. (2020). Barriers to and facilitators of migrant communities’ access to health care in Istanbul. Association for Migration Research. https://gocarastirmalaridernegi.org/wp-content/uploads/GAR_MSF_health.pdf

Harrell-Bond, R. (1989). Repatriation: Under what conditions is it the most desirable solution for refugees? An agenda for research. African Studies Review, 32(1), 41–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/524493

Heck, G., & Hess, S. (2017). Tracing the effects of the EU–Turkey deal. Movements: Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, 3(2), 35–56. https://movements-journal.org/issues/05.turkey/04.heck,hess--tracing-the-effects-ofthe-eu-turkey-deal.html

Heidbrink, L. (2021). Anatomy of a crisis: Governing youth mobility through vulnerability. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(5), 988–1005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1797479

Hovil, L. (2014). Local integration. In E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, G. Loescher, K. Long, & N. Sigona (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of refugee and forced migration studies (pp. 488–498). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199652433.013.0042

Hruschka, C., & Leboeuf, L. (2019). Vulnerability: A buzzword or a standard for migration governance? (Policy brief no. 20). Population Europe. https://population-europe.eu/resear ch/policy-briefs/vulnerability

İçduygu, A. (2024). Refugees in limbo: A question of ontological insecurity. In R. Bryant, A. Abdulla, M. Nimer, & A. Üstübici (Eds.), Lives in limbo: Syrian youth in Turkey (pp. 157–162). Berghahn Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781805395140-011

İçduygu, A., & Aksel, D. B. (2022). Vulnerable permanency in mass influx: The case of Syrians in Turkey. In E. Balkani & Z. K. Tonak (Eds.), Refugees on the move: Crisis and response in Turkey and Europe (pp. 133–158). Berghahn Books. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.9941332.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2vr8tsk.11

İçduygu, A., & Millet, E. (2016). Syrian refugees in Turkey: Insecure lives in an environment of pseudo-integration (Working paper 13). Istituto Affari Internazionali. http://iai.it/sites/default/files/gte_wp_13.pdf

İçduygu, A., & Nimer, M. (2019). The politics of return: Exploring the future of Syrian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 41(3), 415–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1675503

İçduygu, A., & Sert, D. S. (2019). Introduction: Syrian refugees—Facing challenges, making choices. International Migration, 57(2), 121–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12563

Ineli-Ciger, M. (2018). Temporary protection in law and practice. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004327535

Jacobsen, C. M. (2024). Vulnerability governance as differential inclusion: The struggles of asylum seekers in Marseille. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(12), 3030–3048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2293636

Kaya, A. (2017). Istanbul as a space of cultural affinity for Syrian refugees. Southeastern Europe, 41(3), 333–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18763332-04103003

Kaya, A., & Kıraç, A. (2016). Vulnerability assessment of Syrian refugees in Istanbul. Support to Life. https://data.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/54518

Kirişci, K. (2014). Syrian refugees and Turkey’s challenges: Going beyond hospitality. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/syrian-refugees-and-turkeys-challengesgoingbeyond-hospitality/

Klassen, A. (2022). From vulnerability to empowerment: Critical reflections on Canada’s engagement with refugee policy. Laws, 11(2), Article 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11020022

Kocak, M. (2020). Who is “queerer” and deserves resettlement? Queer asylum seekers and their deservingness of refugee status in Turkey. Middle East Critique, 29(1), 29–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2020.1704506

Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (2013). Introduction: What is vulnerability, and why does it matter for moral theory? In C. Mackenzie, W. Rogers, & S. Dodds (Eds.), Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp. 1–30). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.003.0001

Mendola, D., & Pera, A. (2022). Vulnerability of refugees: Some reflections on definitions and measurement practices. International Migration, 60, 108–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12942

Müller-Funk, L., Üstübici, A., & Belloni, M. (2023). Daring to aspire: Theorising aspirations in contexts of displacement and highly constrained mobility. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(15), 3816–3835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2208291

Ní Raghallaigh, M., & Thornton, L. (2017). Vulnerable childhood, vulnerable adulthood: Direct provision as aftercare for aged out separated children seeking asylum in Ireland. Critical Social Policy, 37(3), 386–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317691897

Onay-Coker, D. (2019). The representation of Syrian refugees in Turkey: A critical discourse analysis of three newspapers. Continuum, 33(3), 369–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2019.1587740

Opono, S., & Ahimbisibwe, F. (2024). Protracted refugee situations and the shrinking durable solutions: Could there be a ray of hope in local solutions? Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 2395346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2395346

Ozerim, M. G., & Tolay, J. (2021). Discussing the populist features of anti-refugee discourses on social media: An anti-Syrian hashtag in Turkish Twitter. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(1), 204–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa022

Presidency of Migration Management [PMM]. (n.d.a). Statistics. https://en.goc.gov.tr/

Presidency of Migration Management [PMM]. (n.d.b). Temporary protection. Retrieved September 4, 2025, from https://en.goc.gov.tr/temporary-protection27.

Refugee Rights Türkiye & European Network on Statelessness. (2024, May). Toolkit to identify and address statelessness. https://multecihukuku.net/wp-content/uploads/referans-kaynaklari/2024/12/Toolkit-to-Identify-and-Address-Statelessness-in-Turkiye.pdf

Rottmann, S., & Kaya, A. (2021). “We can’t integrate in Europe. We will pay a high price if we go there”: Culture, time and migration aspirations for Syrian refugees in Istanbul. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(1), 474–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa018

Rygiel, K., Baban, F., & Ilcan, S. (2016). The Syrian refugee crisis: The EU–Turkey “deal” and temporary protection. Global Social Policy, 16(3), 315–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018116666153

Saylan, I., & Aknur, M. (2023). Discourses of Turkish opposition parties towards Syrian refugees: Securitization and repatriation. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2, 259–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1255254

Sengul, I. (2022). Syrian refugees’ homemaking in Gaziantep: Uncertainty, legality and temporality. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 41(2), 267–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdac006

Smith, K., & Waite, L. (2019). New and enduring narratives of vulnerability: Rethinking stories about the figure of the refugee. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(13), 2289–2307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1496816

Sözer, H. (2019). Categories that blind us, categories that bind them: The deployment of the notion of vulnerability for Syrian refugees in Turkey. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(3), 2775–2803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fez020

Sözer, H. (2020). Humanitarianism with a neo-liberal face: Vulnerability intervention as vulnerability redistribution. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(11), 2163–2180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1573661

Szkupinski Quiroga, S., Medina, D. M., & Glick, J. (2014). In the belly of the beast: Effects of anti-immigration policy on Latino community members. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(13), 1723–1742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214537270

Türk, V., & Garlick, M. (2016). From burdens and responsibilities to opportunities: The comprehensive refugee response framework and a global compact on refugees. International Journal of Refugee Law, 28(4), 656–678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eew043

Türk Kızılayı Toplum Temelli Göç Programları. (2020). Sosyal uyum programı faaliyet raporu [Social cohesion program activity report]. https://toplummerkezi.kizilay.org.tr/media/xzto3x3b/20200601-tr-sosyal-uyum-faaliyet-raporu.pdf

Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi İnsan Haklarını İnceleme Komisyonu Mülteci Hakları Alt Komisyonu. (2018). Göç ve uyum raporu [Immigration and integration report]. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/resources_goc_ve_uyum_raporu.pdf

Turner, L. (2015). On encampment and gendered vulnerabilities: A critical analysis of the UK’s vulnerable persons relocation scheme for Syrian refugees. Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration, 5(2), 21–25. https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/268577

Turner, L. (2019). The politics of labeling refugee men as “vulnerable”. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxz033

Society, 28(1), 1–23. https://soas-repository.worktribe.com/output/334511

UNHCR. (n.d.). Resettlement. https://www.unhcr.org/tr/en/ressettlement

UNHCR. (1996). Handbook on voluntary repatriation: International protection. https://www.unhcr.org/media/handbookvoluntary-repatriation-international-protection

UNHCR. (2003). Framework for durable solutions for refugees and persons of concern. https://www.unhcr.org/media/framework-durable-solutions-refugees-and-persons-concern-0

UNHCR. (2005, October 7). Conclusion no. 104 (LVI): Local integration—Adopted by the Executive Committee (2005). https://www.refworld.org/policy/exconc/excom/2005/en/114429

UNHCR. (2011). UNHCR resettlement handbook. https://www.refworld.org/policy/opguidance/unhcr/2011/en/97558

UNHCR. (2024a, June). Emergency appeal: Syria emergency. https://reporting.unhcr.org/operational/situations/syriasituation

UNHCR. (2024b). Projected global resettlement needs report 2025. https://www.unhcr.org/media/projected-global-resettlement-needs-2025

United Nations. (2018). Global compact on refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/media/global-compact-refugees-booklet

van Selm, J. (2004). The strategic use of resettlement: Changing the face of protection? Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 22(1), 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21316

Virokannas, E., Liuski, S., & Kuronen, M. (2020). The contested concept of vulnerability—A literature review. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 327–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1508001

Welfens, N. (2023). “Promising victimhood”: Contrasting deservingness requirements in refugee resettlement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(5), 1103–1124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2117686

Yavcan, B., & El-Ghali, H. A. (2017). Syrian refugee students: The case of Turkey—Policies, practices and perspectives. Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs.

Yıldız, A. (2019). Suriye uyruklu öğrencilerin Türkiye’de yükseköğretime katılımları [Participation of Syrian students in higher education in Turkey]. Yaşar Üniversitesi Yayınları. https://unescochair.yasar.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SURIYE_YUKSEKOGRETIM_KATILIM.pdf

Yıldız, U., & Sert, D. Ş. (2021). Dynamics of mobility–stasis in refugee journeys: Case of resettlement from Turkey to Canada. Migration Studies, 9(2), 196–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz005