Ceci est une version obsolète publiée le 2021-11-22. Consulter la version la plus récente.

The Cautious Politics of “Humanizing” Refugee Research

Auteurs-es

  • Jonathan Darling Department of Geography, Durham University, UK

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40798

Mots-clés :

humanization, refugee studies, refugee mobility, race

Résumé

Dans cette intervention, je réfléchis à ce que pourrait signifier d’ la recherche sur les réfugiés. On suppose souvent que l’humanisation» peutémerger à travers une attention à la particularité de l’individu, en puisant dans la le récit singulier et en utilisant ceci comme moyen de s’identifier, de compatir et potentiellement de comprendre les autres. Cependant, par un tel geste on court le risque de miser sur le recours à la création de relations d’empathie et de compassion qui passe outre à une réponse politique à la déshumanisation et qui repose sur une présomption universaliste de ce qui constitue la catégorie de l’, présomption qui a été remise en question par les écrits postcoloniaux.

Statistiques

Chargement des statistiques…

Références

Arendt, H. (1958). The origins of totalitarianism. Meridian.

Bleiker, R., Campbell, D., Hutchison, E., & Nicholson, X. (2013). The visual dehumanisation of refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.840769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.840769

Burrell, K., & Hörschelmann, K. (2019). Perilous journeys: Visualising the racialised “refugee crisis.” Antipode, 51(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12429

Collyer, M., & King, R. (2016). Narrating Europe’s migration and refugee “crisis.” Human Geography, 9(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861600900201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861600900201

Crawley, H. (2016). Managing the unmanageable? Understanding Europe’s response to the migration “crisis.” Human Geography, 9(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861600900202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861600900202

Crawley, H., & Skleparis, D. (2018). Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s “migration crisis.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1348224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1348224

Darling, J. (2014). From hospitality to presence. Peace Review, 26(2), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2014.906872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2014.906872

Darling, J. (2018). The fragility of welcome. Fennia, 196(2), 220–224. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.75756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.75756

Dempsey, K. E., & McDowell, S. (2019). Disaster depictions and geopolitical representations in Europe’s migration “crisis.” Geoforum, 98(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861600900202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.11.008

El-Enany, N. (2016). Aylan Kurdi: The human refugee. Law Critique, 27(1), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-015-9175-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-015-9175-7

Esposito, R. (2012). Third person. Polity Press.

Forgiarini, M., Gallucci, M., & Malavita, A. (2011). Racism and the empathy for pain on our skin. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00108

George, R. (2018, May 23). Exile or refuge? Lights in the Distance overturns the spurious distinction. New Statesman. https://www.newstatesman.com/2018/05/daniel-trilling-lights-dark-exile-refuge-borders-europe-review

Gill, N. (2016). Nothing personal? Geographies of governing and activism in the British asylum system. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118315996

Gill, N. (2018). The suppression of welcome. Fennia, 196(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.70040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.70040

Greussing, E., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Shifting the refugee narrative? An automated frame analysis of Europe’s 2015 refugee crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(11), 1749–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1282813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1282813

Hartley, L., & Fleay, C. (2017). “We are like animals”: Negotiating dehumanising experiences of asylum-seeker policies in the Australian community Refugee Survey Quarterly, 36(4), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdx010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdx010

Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4

Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045

Ibrahim, Y., & Howarth, A. (2015). Sounds of the jungle: Rehumanizing the migrant. JOMEC Journal, 7, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18573/j.2015.10008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18573/j.2015.10008

Jazeel, T. (2019). Singularity: A manifesto for incomparable geographies. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 40(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12265

Jones, R. (2016). Violent borders: Refugees and the right to move. Verso.

Kingsley, P. (2017). The new odyssey: The story of Europe’s refugee crisis. Faber & Faber.

Kirkwood, S. (2017). The humanisation of refugees: A discourse analysis of UK parliamentary debates on the European refugee “crisis.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2298

McDonald-Gibson, C. (2016). Cast away: Stories of survival from Europe’s refugee crisis. Portobello Books.

Migrant Voice. (2014). Migration and the media. https://www.migrantvoice.org/design2020/img/upload/1._Migration-and-the-Media-2014_.pdf

Nyers, P. (2006). Rethinking refugees: Beyond states of emergency. Routledge.

Papastergiadis, N. (2009). Wog zombie: The de- and re-humanisation of migrants, from mad dogs to cyborgs. Cultural Studies Review, 15(2), 147–178. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v15i2.2043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v15i2.2043

Sales, R. (2002). The deserving and the undeserving? Refugees, asylum seekers and welfare in Britain. Critical Social Policy, 22(3), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830202200305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830202200305

Smith, D. (2016) Refugee stories: Seven personal journeys behind the headlines. Instant Apostle.

Smith, K., & Waite, L. (2019) New and enduring narratives of vulnerability: Rethinking stories about the figure of the refugee. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(13), 2289–2307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1496816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1496816

Trilling, D. (2018). Lights in the distance: Exile and refuge at the borders of Europe. Picador.

Weheliye, A G. (2014). Habeas viscus: Racializing assemblages, biopolitics, and black feminist theories of the human. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822376491

Wilson, H. F. (2014). The possibilities of tolerance: Intercultural dialogue in a multicultural Europe. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(5), 852–868. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13063p DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d13063p

Publié-e

2021-11-22

Versions

Comment citer

Darling, J. (2021). The Cautious Politics of “Humanizing” Refugee Research. Refuge : Revue Canadienne Sur Les réfugiés , 37(2), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40798

Articles similaires

<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> 

Vous pouvez également Lancer une recherche avancée d’articles similaires à cet article.