On Refugee Agency, Bio-Politics, and a New World

Hashem Abushama

doi:10.25071/1920-7336.40794

Auteurs-es

Hashem Abushama School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, UK

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40794

Mots-clés :

flesh, bare life, refugee studies, refugee camps, biopolitics, settler colonialism

Résumé

Cette courte intervention débute par une discussion de la formulation théorique de Giorgio sur la vie , populaire dans les études sur les réfugiés. À partir de l’étude de cas des camps de réfugiés palestiniens, en particulier en Cisjordanie, elle soutient qu’il existe des limitations claires au discours de la biopolitique et de la vie nue. Je soutiens que la vie ne rend pas compte des rapports de pouvoir à plusieurs niveaux, en particulier le colonialisme, l’esclavage, et le génocide des autochtones, qui rendent certaines populations plus vulnérables que d’autres à son pouvoir. Elle ne rend pas compte non plus des modes de sociabilité de ceux qui sont relégués à sa sphère. Je conclus en examinant certaines des formulations théoriques entourant les politiques du corps dans le champ des Black , et particulièrement le concept de chair» chez Alexander Wehelieye (2014) afin d’explorer les nouvelles avenues qu’elles pourraient ouvrir dans les études sur les réfugiés.

Statistiques

Chargement des statistiques…

Références

Abourahme, N. (2015). Assembling and spilling-over: Towards an “ethnography of cement” in a Palestinian refugee camp. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12155

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (D. H. Roazen, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

Ahmad, A. (1994). In theory: Classes, nations, literatures. Verso.

Baraka, A. (1995). Blues people. Payback.

Betts, A., & Bloom, L. (2014). Humanitarian innovation: The state of the art. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. https://www.unocha.org/publication/policy-briefs-studies/humanitarian-innovation-state-art

Chatty, D. (2017). The duty to be generous (karam): Alternatives to rights-based asylum in the Middle East. Journal of the British Academy, 5, 177–199. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/005.177

Chimni, B. S. (1998). The geopolitics of refugee studies: A view from the South. Journal of Refugee Studies, 11(4), 350–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/11.4.350-a

Foucault, M. (1988). The history of sexuality. Vintage.

Hanafi, S. (2013). Explaining spacio-cide in the Palestinian territory: Colonization, separation, and state of exception. Current Sociology, 61(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112456505

Hanafi, S., & Long, T. (2010). Governance, governmentalities, and the state of exception in the Palestinian refugee camps of Lebanon. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(2), 134–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feq014

Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning & Black study. Minor Compositions.

Henni, S. (2017). Architecture of counterrevolution: The French army in Northern Algeria. Gta Verlag.

Lentin, R. (Ed.). (2008). Thinking Palestine. Zed Books.

Malkki, L. H. (1995). Purity and exile: Violence, memory and national cosmology among Hutu refugees in Tanzania. University of Chicago Press.

Mayblin, L. (2014). Colonialism, decolonisation, and the right to be human: Britain and the 1951 Geneva Convention on the Status of Refugees. Journal of Historical Sociology, 27(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12053

Minco, C., Rijke, A., Pallister-Wilkins, P., Tazzioli, M., Vigneswaran, D., van Houtum, H., & van Uden, A. (2021). Rethinking the biopolitical: Borders, refugees, mobilities…. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.Advance online publication. . https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420981389

Oliver, K. (2017). Carceral humanitarianism: Logics of refugee detention. University of Minnesota Press.

Polzer, T. (2009). Negotiating rights: The politics of local integration. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 26(2), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.32081

Ramadan, A., & Fregonese, S. (2017). Hybrid sovereignty and the state of exception in the Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(4), 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1270189

Robinson, C. J. (2000). Black Marxism: The making of the Black radical tradition. University of North Carolina Press.

Said, E. W. (1983). The world, the text, and the critic. Harvard University Press.

Salamanca, O. J., Qato, M., Rabie, K., & Samour, S. (2012). Past is present: Settler colonialism in Palestine. Settler Colonial Studies, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2012.10648823

Salih, R. (2013). From Bare Lives to Political Agents: Palestinian Refugees as Avant-Garde. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 32(2), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdt005

Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. University of Chicago Press.

Smith, M. (2004). Warehousing refugees: A denial of rights, a waste of humanity. World Refugee Survey, 44. https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/SMITH%202004%20Warehousing%20Refugees.pdf

Ticktin, M. I. (2011). Casualties of care: Immigration and the politics of humanitarianism in France. University of California Press.

Tuastad, D. (2017). ‘State of exception’ or ‘state in exile’? The fallacy of appropriating Agamben on Palestinian refugee camps. Third World Quarterly, 38(9), 2159–2170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1256765

Weheliye, A. G. (2014). Habeas viscus: Racializing assemblages, biopolitics, and Black feminist theories of the human. Duke University Press.

Wolfe, P. (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623520601056240

Woroniecka-Krzyzanowska, D. (2017). The right to the camp: Spatial politics of protracted encampment in the West Bank. Political Geography, 61, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.08.007

Yiftachel, O. (2020). From displacement to displaceability: A southeastern perspective on the new metropolis. City, 24(1–2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2020.1739933