Explaining Inequality in the Implementation of Asylum Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.26038Keywords:
Netherlands, asylum policy, refugee status determination, caseworkers, discretion, decision-makingAbstract
The goal of this research was to identify factors that account for procedural and substantive inequality in implementing asylum law. The decisions of ninety-eight caseworkers of the Dutch Immigration and Naturalization Service on an asylum application were related to their answers on a questionnaire. Caseworkers differ in the extent of available information on an asylum application they take for granted and in their final decisions on it. These differences result from work pressure, the caseworkers’ reputation, their role definition, political opinion, and professional background, and policy. Intensifying feedback and decreasing work pressure can achieve more consistent and careful decisions.Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Downloads
Published
2008-09-01
How to Cite
Mascini, P. (2008). Explaining Inequality in the Implementation of Asylum Law. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 25(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.26038
Issue
Section
Feature Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Peter Mascini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Refuge authors retain the copyright over their work, and license it to the general public under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows for non-commercial use, reproduction and adaption of the material in any medium or format, with proper attribution. For general information on Creative Commons licences, visit the Creative Commons site. For the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, review the human readable summary.
