Revisiting the “Imperative of Categories”: Women at Risk in Resettlement Practice

Authors

  • Jessica Schultz Chr Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.41713

Keywords:

resettlement, gender, categorization, vulnerability, Norway, protection

Abstract

Refugee “women at risk” (WaR) have been prioritized since the late 1980s as candidates for third-country resettlement. Drawing on Macklin (1995), this article interrogates the logic and consequences of the WaR category. Through the lens of Norwegian practice, it shows how restrictive interpretations of UNHCR’s criteria and securitized resettlement processes reinforce a culture of disbelief and a focus on non-state protection by men. The application of WaR incentivizes family separation and perpetuates essentialist ideas about women’s vulnerabilities. While a broader category for gender-based risks can moderate WaR’s exclusionary effects, it similarly contributes to legitimizing harmful border regimes.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Jessica Schultz, Chr Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway

Jessica Schultz is a Senior Researcher at the Chr. Michelsen Institute. She can be reached at jessica.schultz@cmi.no.

References

Aalandslid, V. (2008). Overføringsflyktningers integrering i det norske samfunn [The integration of resettled refugees into Norwegian society] (Rapport 2008/4). Statistisk sentralbyrå (SSB). https://www.ssb.no/befolkning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/overforingsflyktningers-integrering-i-det-norske-samfunn

Abu-Lughod, L. (2002). Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 783–790. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3567256

Baines, E. (2017). Vulnerable bodies: Gender, the UN and the global refugee crisis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315234458

Bartolomei, L., Eckert, R., & Pittaway, E. (2014). “What happens there … follows us here”: Resettled but still at risk: Refugee women and girls in Australia. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 30(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.39618

Bhattacharyya, P., Songose, L. & Wilkinson, L. (2021). How sexual and gender-based violence affects the settlement experiences among Yazidi refugee women in Canada. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 3, Article 644846. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2021.644846

Boyd, M. (1999). Gender, refugee status and permanent settlement. Gender Issues, 15(4), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-999-0008-6

Brekke, J.-P., Paasche, E., Sandvik, K., & Espegren, A. (2021). Selection criteria in refugee resettlement: Balancing vulnerability and future integration in eight resettlement countries (Report 2021:3). Institute for Social Science Research. https://samfunnsforskning.brage.unit.no/samfunnsforskning-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2758744/Refugee%2bResettlement.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Crawley, H. (2022). Saving brown women from brown men? “Refugee women,” gender and the racialised politics of protection. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 41(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdac021

De Boer, T., & Zieck, M. (2020). The legal abyss of discretion in the resettlement of refugees: Cherry-picking and the lack of due process in the EU. International Journal of Refugee Law, 32(1), 54–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeaa005

Edwards, A. (2010). Transitioning gender: Feminist engagement with international refugee law and policy 1950–2010. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 29(2), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdq021

European Union. (2024). Regulation 2024/1350 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 establishing a Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework, and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1147. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1350/oj/eng

Finansavisen. (2015, June 21). Vil hente 8.000 homofile flyktninger [Wants to select 8,000 gay refugees]. https://www.finansavisen.no/nyheter/politikk/2015/06/vil-hente-8-000-homofile-flyktninger

Flegar, V. (2018). Who is deemed vulnerable in the governance of migration? Unpacking UNHCR’s and IOM’s policy label for being deserving of protection and assistance. Asiel & Migrantenrecht, 8, 374–383. https://hdl.handle.net/11370/a3948732-107d-4c62-80fb-3c13854ecf91

Fredriksson, J., & Mougne, C. (1994). Resettlement in the 1990s: A review of policy and practice. UNHCR. https://www.refworld.org/reference/research/unhcr/1994/en/76734

Freedman, J. (2019). The uses and abuses of “vulnerability” in EU asylum and refugee protection: Protecting women or reducing autonomy? Papeles del CEIC, 2019(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1387/pceic.19525

Fulu, E. (2007). Gender, vulnerability, and the experts: Responding to the Maldives Tsunami. Development and Change, 38(5), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00436.x

Gilodi, A., Albert, I., & Nienaber, B. (2024). Vulnerability in the context of migration: A critical overview and a new conceptual model. Hu Arenas, 7, 620–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00288-5

Grønningsæter, A. (2024). Concealment, credibility and the construction of the sexual minority refugee [PhD thesis, University of Bergen]. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3133479

Holst, C., & Teigen, M. (2021). Silenced at the border: Norwegian gender equality policies in national branding. In E. Larsen, S. M. Moss, & I. Skjelsbæk (Eds.), Gender equality and nation branding in the Nordic region (pp. 153–172). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003017134

Holth, T. B (2004). Implementering Av et Kjønnsperspektiv i Norsk Flyktningrett [Implementing a gender perspective in Norwegian refugee law]. Institutt for offentlig retts skriftserie. https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kilde/krd/rap/2003/0016/ddd/pdfv/182590-implementeringavetkjonnsperspektivinorskflyktningrett.pdf

Hyndman, J., & Giles, W. (2011). Waiting for what? The feminization of asylum in protracted situations. Gender, Place & Culture, 18(3), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2011.566347

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. (1993). Women refugee claimants fearing gender-related persecution. Guidelines Issued by the chairperson pursuant to section 65(3) of the Immigration Act.

Indra, D. (1987). Gender: A key dimension of the refugee experience. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 6(3), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21503

Jansen, B. (2008). Between vulnerability and assertiveness: Negotiating resettlement in Kakuma Refugee Camp, Kenya. African Affairs, 107(429), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adn044

Kneebone, S., & Macklin, A. (2021). Resettlement. In C. Costello, M. Foster, & J. McAdam (Eds.), Oxford handbook of international refugee law (pp. 1080–1098). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0061

Kvalø, E., Andresen, S., Lunde, H. & Strøm, F. (2023). Overføringsflyktninger i Norge 2023 [Resettled refugees in Norway 2023] (Report, 2023/45). Statistisk sentralbyrå (SSB). https://www.ssb.no/befolkning/innvandrere/artikler/overforingsflyktninger-i-norge-2023

LeBoeuf, L., Brun, C., Lidén, H., Marchetti, S., Nakache, D., & Sarolea, S. (Eds.). (2024). Between protection and harm: Negotiated vulnerabilities in asylum laws and bureaucracies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69808-8

Macklin, A. (1995). Refugee women and the imperative of categories. Human Rights Quarterly, 17(2), 213–277. https://www.jstor.org/stable/762517

Manderson, L., Kelaher, M., Markovic, M., & McManus, K. (1998). A woman without a man is a woman at risk: Women at risk in Australian humanitarian programs. Journal of Refugee Studies, 11(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/11.3.267

McGee, T. (2018). Saving the survivors: Yezidi women, Islamic State and the German admissions program. Kurdish Studies, 6(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.33182/ks.v6i1.435

Mefford, L. (2020). The lived resettlement experience of single refugee mothers from the Democratic Republic of Conco [PhD dissertation, University of Tennessee]. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/6175

Menetrier, A. (2021). Implementing and interpreting refugee resettlement through a veil of secrecy: A case of LGBT resettlement From Africa. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 3, Article 594214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2021.594214

Moreno-Lax, V., & Vavoula, N. (2024). Vulnerability’s legal life: An ambivalent force of migration governance. International Journal of Law in Context, 20(1), 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552323000320

Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Security. (2020). Rundskriv G-15/2020: Retningslinjer for arbeidet med overføringsflyktninger jf. utlendingsloven § 35 [Circular G-15/2020: Guidelines for work with resettled refugees, cf. Immigration Act section 35]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/rundskriv-g-152020-retningslinjer-for-arbeidet-med-overforingsflyktninger-jf.-utlendingsloven--35/id2721765/

Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Security. (2024). Regjeringen foreslår å redusere antallet overføringsflyktninger fra 1 000 til 200 [The government proposes to reduce the number of resetted refugees from 1 000 to 200]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/regjeringen-foreslar-a-redusere-antallet-overforingsflyktninger-fra-1-000-til-200/id3057429/

Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion. (2008). Retningslinjer for arbeidet med overføringsflyktninger [Guidelines for work with resettled refugees]. https://flyktning.net/ressurs/retningslinjer-for-arbeidet-med-overforingsflyktninger

Otto, D. (2016). International human rights law: Towards rethinking sex/gender dualism. In M. Davies & V. E. Munroe (Eds.), Ashgate research companion to feminist legal theory (1st ed., pp. 197–215). Ashgate Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612973

Peroni, L. (2018). The protection of women asylum seekers under the European Convention on Human Rights: Unearthing the gendered roots of harm. Human Rights Law Review, 18(2), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy005

Peroni, L., & Timmer, A. (2013). Vulnerable groups: The promise of an emerging concept in European Human Rights Convention law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11(4), 1056–1085. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot042

Querton, C. (2022). Non-state actors of protection and the sliding scale of protection for refugee women. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 41(3), 444–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdac020

Sandvik, K. B. (2009). The physicality of legal consciousness: Suffering and the production of credibility in refugee resettlement. In R. A. Wilson & R. D. Brown (Eds.), Humanitarianism and suffering: The mobilization of empathy (pp. 223–244). Cambridge University Press. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3129454

Sandvik, K. B., Bjørhaug, I., Espegren, A., & Garnier, A. (2023). Protecting skilled Afghan women: Brain save and the politics of vulnerability. Global Policy, 14(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13166

Schultz, J., & Nakache, D. (2024). Unsettling expectations of stay: Probationary immigration policies in Canada and Norway. Comparative Migration Studies, 12, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00379-y

Sözer, H. (2019). Humanitarianism with a neo-liberal face: Vulnerability intervention as vulnerability redistribution. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(11), 2163–2180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1573661

Sözer, H. (2021). Categories that blind us, categories that bind them: The deployment of the notion of vulnerability for Syrian refugees in Turkey. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(3), 2775–2803. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fez020

Spencer-Nimmons, N. (1994). Canada’s response to the issue of refugee women: The women at risk program. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 14(7), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21843

Stepnitz, A. (2023). Believing asylum-seeking women: Doing gender in legal narratives of sexual and gender-based violence. Social & Legal Studies, 32(5), 776–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639221140907

Ticktin, M. (2011). The gendered human of humanitarianism: Medicalising and politicising sexual violence. Gender & History, 23, 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0424.2011.01637.x

Turner, L. (2015). On encampment and gendered vulnerabilities: A critical analysis of the UK’s vulnerable persons relocation scheme for Syrian refugees. Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration, 5(2), 21–25. https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/268577

Turner, L. (2019). Syrian refugee men as objects of humanitarian care. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21(4), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2019.1641127

UN General Assembly. (2020). World Conference for the United Nations Decade for Women. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/19576?v=pdf&ln=fr

UNHCR. (1991). Resettlement as an instrument of protection: Traditional problems in achieving this durable solution and new directions in the 1990s. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/unhcr/1991/en/41121

UNCHR. (1997). Resettlement handbook. International Protection Division. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/533264?ln=en&v=pdf

UNHCR. (2004). Resettlement handbook, 2004. Department of International Protection. https://www.refworld.org/policy/opguidance/unhcr/2004/en/102419

UNHCR. (2011). Resettlement handbook, 2011. https://www.refworld.org/policy/opguidance/unhcr/2011/en/97558

UNHCR. (2013). Resettlement and women-at-risk: Can the risk be reduced? https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/51de6e929.pdf

UNHCR. (2023). Resettlement handbook. https://www.unhcr.org/resettlement-handbook/

UNHCR. (2025). 2026 projected global resettlement needs. https://www.unhcr.org/publications/2026-projected-global-resettlement-needs-pgrn

UNHCR Regional Bureau for Europe. (2021). Europe resettlement—January–December 2020. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/europe-resettlement-regional-bureau-europe-january-december-2020

United Nations. (1951). Convention relating to the status of refugees. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-relating-status-refugees

United Nations. (1984). Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-against-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman-or-degrading

Utlendingsdirektoratet. (2016). Anvendelse av uttakskriteriene for overføringsflyktninger [Application of the selection criteria for resettled refugees]. https://www.udiregelverk.no/rettskilder/udi-retningslinjer/udi-2016-015/

Utne, H., & Strøm, F. (2020). Overføringsflyktninger 2019 [Resettled refugees 2019] (Rapport 2020/2). Statistisk sentralbyrå (SSB). https://www.ssb.no/befolkning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/overforingsflyktninger-2019

Valji, N. (2001). Women and the 1951 Refugee Convention: Fifty years of seeking visibility. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 19(5), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21227

Welfens, N. (2023). “Promising victimhood”: Contrasting deservingness requirements in refugee resettlement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(5), 1103–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2117686

Welfens, N., & Bekyol, Y. (2021). The politics of vulnerability in refugee admissions under the EU–Turkey statement. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, Article 622921. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.622921

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

Schultz, J. (2026). Revisiting the “Imperative of Categories”: Women at Risk in Resettlement Practice. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 42(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.41713

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.