Explaining Inequality in the Implementation of Asylum Law

Authors

  • Peter Mascini Erasmus University of Rotterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.26038

Keywords:

Netherlands, asylum policy, refugee status determination, caseworkers, discretion, decision-making

Abstract

The goal of this research was to identify factors that account for procedural and substantive inequality in implementing asylum law. The decisions of ninety-eight caseworkers of the Dutch Immigration and Naturalization Service on an asylum application were related to their answers on a questionnaire. Caseworkers differ in the extent of available information on an asylum application they take for granted and in their final decisions on it. These differences result from work pressure, the caseworkers’ reputation, their role definition, political opinion, and professional background, and policy. Intensifying feedback and decreasing work pressure can achieve more consistent and careful decisions.

Metrics

PDF views
313
Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202620
|

Published

2008-09-01

How to Cite

Mascini, P. (2008). Explaining Inequality in the Implementation of Asylum Law. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 25(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.26038

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.