A Canadian Perspective on the Subjective Component of the Bipartite Test for “Persecution”: Time for Re-evaluation

Authors

  • Michael Bossin Community Legal Services and University of Ottawa
  • Laila Demirdache Community Legal Services

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21322

Keywords:

Canada, asylum policy, refugee status determination, persecution, fear, bipartite test

Abstract

Canadian decision makers refer so regularly to the bipartite nature of the test for persecution in refugee claims that one rarely gives the matter a second thought. After all, the Supreme Court of Canada in Ward clearly affirmed that a refugee claimant must subjectively fear persecution, and this fear must be well-founded in an objective sense. In this article, the authors focus on the meaning and validity of the subjective aspect of the bipartite test. It is especially appropriate to do so at this time, given the introduction of the term “person in need of protection” in section 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, and recent Federal Court decisions holding that the subjective fear is not a requirement in section 97 cases. Looking at the issue of subjective fear from historical, psychological, and legal perspectives, the authors argue: (a) that the drafters of the UN Convention never intended claimants to be “subjectively afraid” in order to qualify for protection; (b) determining an asylum seeker’s state of mind presents a minefield of potential problems for decision makers; and (c) given the new IRPA provisions dealing with persons in need of protection, the question is not whether there is a bipartite test for determining well-founded fear, but whether, indeed, there ought to be such a test.

Metrics

PDF views
1,656
Jul 2004Jan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202667
|

Published

2004-05-01

How to Cite

Bossin, M., & Demirdache, L. (2004). A Canadian Perspective on the Subjective Component of the Bipartite Test for “Persecution”: Time for Re-evaluation. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 22(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21322

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.