Defining Due Process Down: Expedited Removal in the United States

Authors

  • Stephen M. Knight University of California, Hastings College of the Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21213

Keywords:

United States, expedited removal, judicial review, asylum, law, refoulement

Abstract

Canadians debating the merits of restricting access to the national territory by asylum seekers and others should consider the experience of the United States with its new expedited removal process. Three years after its enactment, U.S. immigration authorities have come to rely on expedited removal. Yet many troubling questions have been raised about the treatment by immigration officers of individuals in expedited removal and about the impact of the mandatory detention of asylum seekers. A particular concern arises from the elimination of the fundamental safeguard of judicial review.
Citations
  • Citation Indexes: 2
Captures
  • Readers: 3

Metrics

PDF views
299
Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004Jul 2004Jan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202619
|

Published

2001-02-01

How to Cite

Knight, S. M. (2001). Defining Due Process Down: Expedited Removal in the United States. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 19(4), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21213
Crossref
0
Scopus
0

Similar Articles

<< < 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.